the week in tweets – 2009-06-20

  • The boys drug me outside to see a Lamborghini in a neighbor's yard – I'm old because all I thought was "expensive driving phallic symbol" #
  • Crap – if only Kevin Garnett had been healthy. Things would have been different against the Celtics. Stupid Lakers. #nbafinals #
  • Noah & I thought it would be fun to ride our bikes to his baseball game. Wouldn't you know it, it's starting to rain. #
  • Reading Ephesians 1:15-23 for Sunday and loving on Cash's song "Personal JESUS!" WOW! REACH OUT AND TOUCH FAITH! #
  • @zmikko – the same is true on the edges 🙂 in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko -not sure i completely agree with that statement but since limbaugh is a jackass, & leading, there is probably some truth to it. 🙂 in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – that's cool – i wasn't trying to defend air america in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – sorry about apparently offending you with limbuahg – i thought we were using humor in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – though it does seem odd that you attack that considering you call our president labamba 🙂 in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – you do realize this is twitter? how do i provide facts for limbaugh being a blow hard? maybe his hypocrisy on drugs and marriage? in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – oh okay – "jackass" is my pet name for limbaugh then 🙂 in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – i've looked. you do provide some facts but the crap like the birth certificate is a red herring and you know it. in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – no mention of policy where? in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – that's because he doesn't set policy – at least i don't think he's ever had that much control of the rnc – who knows though. in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – because it gives you guys such fun being mad 🙂 and of course, the far wing would just find some other conspiracy in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – please refer back to the aforementioned hypocrisy on drugs & marriage – that was my mention – also it's a pet name so that's good? in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – 400,000/304,059,724 (us pop as of 7/2008) = 0.1% – not very significant – look a fact, you've taught me well 🙂 in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – if it's agreed that he's not an illegal then what cover up do you hope to expose by hoping to find a "fraudulent" birth cert? in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – i'm guessing you won't take snopes.com as facts but i'm not sure who else you would want to view the cert. http://bit.ly/OfIbu in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – ronic from the guy he dismissed the un"INFORMED" earlier in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – actually i believe the '08 dem platform is more consistently prolife than the rnc's in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko glad you think so BUT the rnc platform was simply to reverse roe which doesn't get rid of abortion – just sends it back to states in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko & since repubs have nominated 7 of 9 supreme's they obviously don't want to reverse it and get rid of the issue in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – dnc platform wanted to continue but reduce abortion – i can at least work with that- it was also anti-death penalty a prolife iss in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – as for people seeing the actual birth cert -dir of health & dir of vital stats from his home state have – their people 🙂 in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – that's a state's rights argument and isn't prolife or not – it's trying to coopt prolife for its own agenda in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – btw, about to have to start supper so i'll be quiting soon in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – thats hard to believe when a 7 of 9 majority can't overturn one case – smacks of not wanting to overturn it but use it as an issue in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – then why should i trust them & vote for them? why should any prolifer? in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – don't assume so much – i don't hold dem or repub, conservative or progressive ideals. trying to hold biblical ones. in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – sometimes this means one side, sometimes both, and many times neither. in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – sorry that description could fit either one – which one were you talking about? again, read my last tweet – i'm not FOR either one in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – which election? which race? not always the same party. in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – come to think of it i've never voted for a party – party votes seems kind of stupid to me. i do however votes for individuals. in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – i'm assuming presidential elections here. '08 obama, '04 bush, '00 bush, '96 dole, '92 bush, '88 bush. fit your pattern? in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – agreed with more of his platform, not a big fan of continuing some of bush's policies, no longer believe the rnc on abortion, etc. in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – some of the etc. includes not believing rnc is family friendly beyond slogans, in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – don't depend upon a political part to bring about CHRISTian ethics. CHRISTians do that. my vote was because i believe in reduction in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – a platform of "get rid of roe" doesn't do anything about abortion – it just pretends to so that people will vote for the party in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – which part? in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – the platform on abortion involved reduction – remember "safe, legal, and rare" – more truthful than "we'll overturn roe" in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko – i agreed & i'm opposed to abortion BUT IMHO doing something is better than nothing which is what's happened since nixon in reply to zmikko #
  • @zmikko -but saying "we'll overturn roe" has been a great way to keep the religious right voting republican who cares that it won't happen? in reply to zmikko #
  • noah's baseball season is officially over now. they made it to the second round of the playoffs & then lost. #
  • @theboy1der – color me green in reply to theboy1der #
  • @theboy1der – thanks bud. you're the best. in reply to theboy1der #
  • i just finished massaging pam's butt – not in a good way – it was to help with nerve pain. #
  • @jesslawrence1 – that will intimidate them. in reply to jesslawrence1 #
  • "develop a servant, get a leader: develop a leader, get an ego" – unknown author #
  • conducting work at Emy J's coffee house is one of my favorite things EVEN when my laptop is covered in cat hair – SUPID SHEDDING CATS! #
  • @exchangedliving – i hate to jump in on a causey-trinity conversation but i heard you were the favorite b/c of your sickly childhood 🙂 in reply to exchangedliving #
  • there is pure comedy in watching some people parallel park – thus far 8 minutes worth of such comedy … and still counting #
  • To Belt's or not to Belt's? That is the question. #
  • @meganckelly – that's great. how long did it take for you to realize this? in reply to meganckelly #
  • @natebyrd3 – great movie in reply to natebyrd3 #

Powered by Twitter Tools.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.