Please Collaborate With Me

collaborate

I don’t usually write blog posts just to threads but this post is just for those of you who are a regular part of Tapestry. My proposal has been approved and therefore the research begins. I am doing a project to judge the effectiveness of collaborative sermon preparation. This means I need some subjects for the project. I am looking for 6 to 12 people to form two groups that will be a part of the project for 6 weeks.

Here is what I need from the people who volunteer.

  • A commitment to be at Tapestry October 14th through November 18th.
  • A commitment to participate in a weekly message prep meeting (most likely on Sunday mornings) either October 7th – 21st or October 28th – November 11th.
  • A commitment to participate in a Google Document discussion for whichever 3 week time period you collaborate.
  • A commitment to complete a questionnaire for each message you listen to whether you collaborate on that message or not. I will ask you to complete the questionnaire the night of the message and again later in the week. These will be online or paper depending upon your preference.
  • An interview at the end of the experiment.

Interested? You will be helping me out and, I believe, shaping the future of the message at Tapestry. You will also earn my undying gratitude and possibly some jambalaya, salsa, or a beanie baby.

Apparently I Am A Bad Pastor

affliction

The above image is a screen shot from the final proposal for my D.min project / dissertation. I am going through the corrections that the style reader (the person I pay as a part of my tuition to suggest corrections for  my proposal so that meets the Turabian style requirements) placed in my proposal. I just found the above correction where I am apparently described “religious affiliation” as “religious affliction.”

Whoops. I’m not sure if that is a Freudian slip or not.

According to Eric G. this makes me a bad pastor. He is probably right.

Over-spiritualizing

how-to-over-spiritualize-everything-562x281

Right now the small group that Pam and I are a part of (which I love) is reading through Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s classic book “The Cost of Discipleship” (which I also love). In his chapter on “Single-Minded Obedience” Bonhoeffer discusses our tendency to over-spiritualize Jesus’s statements and commands in such a way that we actually disobey the commands while thinking that we are obeying them. We take the command of Christ and think to ourselves

He obviously didn’t mean that literally. No He meant that I should live out the spirit of the statement. He just used the literal/physical example as a way for me to understand His actual meaning.

Then we disobey the command of God and actually think we are obeying Jesus. I love the example Bonhoeffer gives.

Dietrich Bonhoeffer states:

How is such absurdity possible? What has happened that the word of Jesus can be thus degraded by this trifling, and thus left open to the mockery of the world? When orders are issued in other spheres of life there is no doubt whatever of their meaning. If a father sends his child to bed, the boy knows at once what he has to do. But suppose he has picked up a smattering of pseudo-theology. In that case he would argue more or less like this: “Father tells me to go to bed, but he rally means that I am tired, and he does not want me to be tired. I can overcome tiredness just as well if I go out and play. Therefore though father tells me to go to bed, he really means: ‘Go out and play.’” If a child tried such arguments on his father or a citizen on his government, they would both meet with a kind of language they could not fail to understand — in short they would be punished. Are we to treat the commandment of Jesus differently from other orders and exchange single-minded obedience for downright disobedience? How could that be possible! (p. 81)

It seems odd to say that sometimes we over-spiritualize Jesus. After all, I believe that Jesus is 100% God & 100% human. I think you could argue that such over-spiritualization isn’t spiritual at all. It is just another face that we use for disobedience. Still I think Bonhoeffer nails it because sometimes we (read this as “I”) use the “spiritual” to avoid the literal words/meaning of Christ.

Chosen Profession

I love and I am honored by what I get to do. I am reminded very often what a wonderous thing it is to be trusted enough to be some one’s minister. It is a gift that I hope I live up to. I hope that I function in such a manner as to be as close to worthy of God’s calling as I can be and that I live in such a way that I show respect for my friends for the trust they put in me. Like I said, I love what I do.

But…

If I were to do something else I would seriously consider following Pam’s career path as a speach language pathologist. I feel like I am amazed by something she has done at least once a week. I know part of it is the fact that my wife is incredible but the other part is that she works in a fascinating field. What she does makes a real difference in people’s lives and it is very challenging. I’m not looking to change careers but I do think that what she does is real cool.

Bad Lip Reading – The Hunger Games

 

Adam showed this to Pam and me last night. Quite funny.

2012 Thread Weddings

553556_4379698657174_626456545_n

To my knowledge the Thread weddings for 2012 are over. It made for a fun and busy Summer. I officiated 4 of the 5 weddings and I had the privilege of doing the pre-marital counseling for all 5 of them.

I can’t wait to see what happens in 2013. 🙂

225962_276465019132368_1243101354_n IMG_2570

IMG_2540 378333_10150990325381513_792689015_n

Existential Pop

Clint Barron sent me a parody twitter feed that I think is hilarious. It is the feed of @KimKierkegaard which combines the profound thoughts of Søren Kierkegaard with the “profound” thoughts of Kim Kardashian. He is a sample of this awesomeness.

From this @KimKierkegaard’s feed I found the wonderfulness that is @Justin_Buber – a combination of the Martin Buber and Justin Bieber. Which leads to wonderful thoughts such as this:

So now I am considering doing my own parody twitter account. I’ll not go down the existential route but I am instead thinking two German loves. I am considering combining Dietrich Bonhoeffer and David Hasselhoff. He would be Dietrich Hasselhoeffer.

AC Will Come Sooner Than You Think

 

Tapestry has participated in Advent Conspiracy since our beginning. I just found this “teaser” video for this years AC and thought I would use it as a reminder to start planning now for how you can “turn your Christmas upside down.”

During Advent we will try to…

  • Spend Less
  • Give More
  • Love All

It is always an excellent plan.

Prophetic Voice & Christians In Politics

I found this image at http://onlysometimesclever.wordpress.com/2012/03/28/hellfire-and-damnation/ . Not sure where it originally came from.

I have an acquaintance who regularly refers to himself as “a prophetic voice for [his] generation.” Though I don’t know him well I can say from my encounters with him that I believe him to be a nice enough guy who is trying to do his best so this post isn’t about dogging on him. However, if I were to have a conversation with him I would question his use of the word “prophetic” because from what I have seen, heard, and read in the vast majority of his “prophetic” statements. They are almost always about how those outside of the Church are screwing up. He very rarely comes down on the church’s failure and I’ve never heard him name his own church’s failures. If you read the Bible, especially the Old Testament, you will see that prophets preach to the outsiders every now and then. Jonah is a pretty good example of this. God sent Jonah to preach to the Ninevehvites who, at least as far Jonah seems to have been concerned, were about as diametrical opposite the people of God as one could get. Interestingly the prophet Jonah didn’t want to speak prophetically to the Ninevehvites but when he finally gave into God and did preach to them the people of Nineveh responded in repentance and turned from their sin.

But the prophets’ normal role in the Bible isn’t pointing out the sin of non-believers. Instead they usually focused on saying “thus saith the Lord” to the people of God.

The majority of the prophets preached prophetically to the people of God. They shouted to the people of God “You know God saved you in the past and you promised to live a certain way in response. Have you forgotten? Now change your ways.” There are tons of examples in the Bible but my personal favorite is Amos. He was probably a migrant worker (he is described as having two separate agricultural jobs), someone of little power and influence. Yet God used Him to speak prophetically to the powerful of the Northern Kingdom of Israel who called themselves His people. Amos called out the sins of other nations as well but he spent the vast majority of his preaching pointing out the sin of those who claimed to be God’s people. That’s my problem with my acquaintance’s “prophetic voice” he is always preaching in the church about how bad the rest of the world is screwing up.  Preaching to the church about how bad the world is just doesn’t seem very prophetic.

So here is my problem with how most Christians act in politics.

We tend to fight for one party to win by pointing out the failures of the other party and ignoring the failures of our own. This is true of everyone, Christian or not. I believe those of us who claim Jesus as our Lord have a much higher calling that none of the political parties follow very well. This means that while we can praise certain elements of a political party’s platform we still need to call for more. Christians within the Libertarian, Republican, Democratic, and other parties need to be be speaking prophetically to all the parties. These political parties should have a love/hate relationship with the church. They might love our votes but we should be acting in such a way that they feel like we are always asking for more changes in the areas of the party that don’t line up very well with Jesus.

To use poor political stereo types, those of us Christians who are Democrats should be constantly challenging the party on abortion and personal responsibility. Those of us Christians who are Republicans should be pushing the party concerning caring for the “least of these” (Matthew 25:31-46) and war. Those of us Christians who are Libertarian should push the party to care for people other than just ourselves. Finally, those of us who are independent in our mindset should be a royal pain in the butt to everyone. 🙂 I know these are very broad generalizations and in many ways inaccurate but hopefully they help to illustrate the point I am trying to make. We Christians need to speak prophetically to the political parties. Speaking in such a manner within the political process means we don’t let our own political parties “off the hook” just because we agree with them a little more than the other parties.

pam's post "nothing in return"

If you don’t regularly read both of Pam’s blogs (Ept, Couth, and Comobobulated & The Secret Life of a Pastor’s Wife) then you are missing out and should reconsider your life choices. Here’s a wonderful post she wrote concerning the church doing things with the mindset of receiving nothing in return. She discusses the party we threw this past Saturday for the children of migrant workers. I love the way Pam thinks.